Wednesday 18 January 2012

David Cameron urges Tories to back gay marriage

David Cameron urges Tories to back gay marriage

by
5 October 2011, 3:52pm

Prime minister David Cameron has urged reluctant Tory MPs and members to support gay marriage.

Giving his keynote speech at the party conference in Manchester, Mr Cameron urged the party to back the move because of its Conservatism, not in spite of it.

Last month, ministers announced that a consultation would be held on how to introduce same-sex marriage before 2015.

The prime minister, who backed committment between same-sex couples in his 2005 speech, told supporters today: “I stood before a Conservative conference once and I said it shouldn’t matter whether commitment was between a man and a woman, a man and another man or a woman and a woman.

“You applauded me for that. Five years on, we’re consulting on legalising gay marriage.

“And to anyone who has reservations, I say this: Yes, it’s about equality, but it’s also about something else: commitment. Conservatives believe in the ties that bind us; that society is stronger when we make vows to each other and support each other.

“So I don’t support gay marriage in spite of being a Conservative. I support gay marriage because I am a Conservative.”

The camera then cut to Samantha Cameron applauding her husband’s remarks as members cheered and clapped.

In the 50-minute speech, Mr Cameron focused on overseas aid, free schools, housing, community spirit and the economy.

A controversial line about telling families to cut their personal debts and store cards was removed and replaced with the assertion that households were already doing so.

The prime minister also cracked some jokes at the expense of his cabinet members.

Describing how Conservatives had been recording books for the blind, he said that Chancellor George Obsorne could record ‘The Man Who Would Be King’ and Boris Johnson could record ‘The Joys of…. Cycling’.

Themes of the speech included leadership, discipline and optimism.

He promised a “new Tory housing revolution” and vowed to cut red tape to boost business growth.

Mr Cameron said: “The critics will say to me: what about workers’ rights? But the most important worker’s right of all is having a job in the first place.”

He also called to businesses to offer more apprenticeships, promising that the government would fund places if companies “show more leadership”.

On education, he said that for too long, society had come to expect less from poor and ethnic minority children.

He said: “I am disgusted by the idea that we should aim for any less for a child from a poor background than a rich one. I have contempt for the notion that we should accept narrower horizons for a black child than a white one. Yes it’s the age-old irony of the liberal left: they practice oppression and call it equality.”

Praising free schools and academies, he called for more business and entrepreneurs to assist in setting them up.

Mr Cameron concluded: “Britain never had the biggest population, the largest land mass, the richest resources, but we had the spirit.

“Remember: it’s not the size of the dog in the fight – it’s the size of the fight in the dog. Overcoming challenge, confounding the sceptics, reinventing ourselves, this is what we do. It’s called leadership.”

Discuss this story: 261 COMMENTS
GET THE DAILY PINK NEWS EMAIL NEWSLETTER
It's getting close to Valentines 2012, and I am looking forward to attending the first Annual Erotic LGBT History Valentines Special at the Brixton Library.
‎1st Annual Erotic Lounge LGBT History Month Valentines Special
Brixton Library 20.00 pm -22.00 pm
14 February - Free admission -

Poets and writers celebrating Black Erotica

https://www.facebook.com/events/230706443676350/

The following is:

Sh*t Homophobic People Say

http://youtu.be/SVEmHcz-SBs

Tory MP: Not the time for gay marriage debate

by
17 January 2012, 12:28pm

A backbench revolt against equal marriage rights is reported to be brewing ahead of the government’s consultation in March.

The Independent reports that at one of the Conservative party’s weekly 1922 Committee meetings, backbenchers expressed opposition to the government’s planned consultation.

Conservative MP for Enfield-Southgate, David Burrowes told the Independent the debate should be about “how we view marriage rather than about homosexual rights”, and said there was no public outcry for marriage equality.

Talking to the paper about same-sex marriage, he said: “Many colleagues are worried that it would fundamentally affect how marriage between a man and woman has historically been viewed in this country.

“There are strong doubts that we need to go down this path. It would open up a can of worms and a legal minefield about freedom, religion and equalities legislation.”

Equalities legislation was also cited in a challenge to the new rules on allowing civil partnerships in religious institutions.

In December, a short-lived Lords revolt questioned whether the rules meant churches would be forced to perform civil partnership ceremonies in order to stay within equality laws, despite assurances this would not be the case.

Burrowes continued: “Gay marriage is a debate we don’t need to have at this stage. It is not an issue people are hammering us on the doorstep to do something about.

“It is important that there is a reasoned debate around how we view marriage rather than about homosexual rights. It may open up old wounds and put people into the trenches; no one wants that.”

But it is unclear how widespread dissent would be after the consultation, and how much it would hinder the progress of legislation.

Adrian Trett, the Chair of LGBT+ Liberal Democrats said today: “As the only major party to support equal marriage, we will continue to work hard to bring it about, working with supporters from all parties and none.”

James Asser, Co-chair of LGBT Labour said: “It’s very disappointing but unsurprising to see the comments of David Burrowes and hear that there is likely to be opposition from Tory MPs. This is the second time in the last few months that we’ve seen Conservative MPs on the Government payroll speak-out against marriage equality. Ultimately if this comes to a vote in Parliament there will be enough Labour and Lib Dem MPs with some of the minority parties to overcome any Tory rebellion and ensure marriage equality passes in the House of Commons.

“This should give us all a warning though that those opposed to LGBT rights are intending to fight marriage equality every step of the way. We can expect to see the same old prejudices we saw when Civil Partnerships were debated back in 2005. The key battle-ground in this fight, however, is still going to be the House of Lords where we can expect even stronger oppposition than there will be in the House of Commons.”

Burrowes added in his comments to the Independent: “There are many other ways that the Conservatives can show we are a modern party – not least our social justice agenda. This is too important an issue to decide in terms of where it positions our party.”

In October of last year, the Prime Minister said: “To anyone who has reservations, I say this: Yes, it’s about equality, but it’s also about something else: commitment. Conservatives believe in the ties that bind us; that society is stronger when we make vows to each other and support each other.

“So I don’t support gay marriage in spite of being a Conservative. I support gay marriage because I am a Conservative.”

A Number 10 source said today: “The Prime Minister stands by this commitment and we look forward to the consultation beginning.”

Burrowes reaffirmed today he did not “see the need for gay marriage to be enshrined in legislation which I see more in terms of a redefinition of marriage than an issue of homosexual rights”, but denied his views showed him to be anti-gay or homophobic.

In a statement, he said: “I recognise that there are strong opinions for and against the proposal of marriage and I hope the debate can be conducted with respect without resort to abuse and prejudice. I do not see the need for gay marriage to be enshrined in legislation which I see more in terms of a redefinition of marriage than an issue of homosexual rights.”

“In my view Civil Partnerships has already made great strides for homosexual rights which mean the case still needs to be made for Parliament to now legislate.”

The MP wrote that “if you change the shape of marriage away from being a union of a man and woman you change its purpose. Colleagues on all sides of Parliament will agree and disagree and we need to ensure that there is an open debate which does not descend to prejudice and abuse.”

He concluded: “I do not see the need for legislation to recognise gay marriage but it does not at all follow that I am anti gay and homophobic. I welcome and await the debate in March but also recognise that there are more pressing issues of concern facing my constituents and the country. For example today I was pleased to lead an important debate about how we care for the dying and support good quality palliative care.”

Discuss this story: 132 COMMENTS
ADD PINK NEWS TO YOUR FACEBOOK NEWS FEED

No comments:

Post a Comment